[pure-silver] Re: Kodak Readyload?
- From: John <jbuf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Well but even worst than that is an 8x10 ground glass , negative and enlarger
JOhn
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hornford <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sep 12, 2004 10:41 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kodak Readyload?
John,
A far, far worse thing to do is look at a 5x7 negative and own a 5x7
enlarger.
Regards Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of john frost
Sent: September 12, 2004 11:38 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kodak Readyload?
Kodak's single sheet system is good. I use it (Kodak readyloads)in my Phase
1 Readyload holder and my Polaroid 545 (metal version), as well as the Fuji
products.
john (:>))) don't EVER look through the gg on a 5x7, tho......
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
