On 28 July 2010 15:35, Don Sweet <don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A good answer to this question must also deal with the possibility that > they > aren't by Adams. > > The more I read the lawyer's statement as reported in the CNN article the > less confident I became. It sounds like a closing address to a jury: > Experts, including a former FBI agent and a U.S. attorney, "came to the > conclusion that, based on the evidence which was overwhelming, that > no reasonable person would have > any doubt that these, in fact, were the long-lost images of Ansel > Adams," Arnold said > > So, if all the "reasonable" people are later shown to be wrong, and some > future buyer is looking at a loss of $200m, who should compensate whom? > > Don Sweet > Don, did you gloss over the following paragraph ? "*I have sent people to prison for the rest of their lives for far less evidence than I have seen in this case,*" said evidence and burden of proof expert Manny Medrano, who was hired by Norsigian to help authenticate them. "*In my view, those photographs were done by Ansel Adams.*" If Manny is lying then bad luck for the buyer and/or those in prison. Peter