[pure-silver] Re: Densitometer

  • From: "Ralph W. Lambrecht" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 01:07:55 +0200

In addition, you can use the Stouffer step wedges to calibrate your darkroom
meter to read densities.





Regards



Ralph W. Lambrecht

http://www.darkroomagic.com







On 2006-04-14 00:31, "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:20 AM
> Subject: [pure-silver] Densitometer
> 
> 
>> 
>>   Is there anyone on the list who had a Densitometer who'd
>> be willing
>> analyze a roll of 120 film for me? Or, is there a shop
>> where you can
>> send your negs to who will analyze them?
>> 
>>   Thanks
>> 
>>   J
>> 
>> -- 
>> Justin F. Knotzke
>> jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.shampoo.ca
>> 
> 
>    In liu of a densitometer its not difficult to estimate
> the density using a step wedge. The eye is pretty good at
> matching brightness on a side by side basis. Good step
> wedges are available from Stouffer for around $10 each US.
> You don't need the more expensive "calibrated" versions.
>    For a very rough estimate you can use the Kodak rule for
> roll and sheet film that is on a clear support. Place the
> negative on a sheet of printed paper, a book for instance.
> If the negative is for printing with a diffusion source the
> densest highlight that is to have detail should be just
> dense enough to block out the type. For a negative that is
> for printing on a condenser source the same highlight should
> be transparent enough to just allow seeing the type through
> it. The shadows that are to have detail should have that
> detail visible.
>    One can even get a rough estimate of density by
> comparison with a Kodak Projection Print Scale although they
> are quite variable one to another. This scale is an actual
> silver transparency while some others are half-tone ink
> dots, the latter are useless for anything.
> 
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.


=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: