Don=B4t know about you, but this bullshitter here called Snoopy is now=20 leaving the list. I have kids of my own to take care of. I don=B4t need the= =20 extra work to cope with more obnoxious behaviour. What an utter and complete waste of time. Love, all the same, Snoopy At 17:07 05.06.2005, you wrote: >From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Getting back on track was Re: Agfa Sistan...=20 >now Selenium Protection >Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:00:31 -0700 > > > Courtesy is a necessity if one wants to have a civilized society. I > > think there are so many benifits to a civilized society that I have > > no question as to its desirability. > >Posting information once was out of my courtesy. Simply because I have >just that much courtesy, if you think someone else can demand further >public service out of me, that's entirely wrong, especially because >that someone does not have any personal need for that information. >Two people indeed demonstrated that they found the info with no >trouble. In retrospect I should not have contributed any information >from the beginning. People like to repeat inaccurate statements that >they want to believe than to pursue truth and rationales. Some people >are so satisfied with incomplete information cut and pasted from old >books that they don't want to hear about a new line of evidences. > >Internet forums have full of low quality information of questionable >accuracy, with lots of cut and paste work from books and magazine >articles (and USENET posts by someone else). Not enough people get >their asses up to consult credible sources and run experiments of >their own to evaluate the reliability and repeatability of the >reported information. Thus nonsense grows and they becomes "truth" >once it's repeated enough number of times. Richard Knoppow used to >criticize this very fact with reference to the Nazi propaganda, but I >must say he is trapped in the very problem that he criticized for >several topics. > >I hate to deal with nonsense no matter how pain in the ass Ralph >Lambrecht is. I probably won't change my no-BS attitude to >photography in general. Certainly not because Richard Knoppow and Jim >Brick decide something out of Ralph's annoyance. But as I told several >people off list I'm sick of this brouhaha and I let them continue >whatever they have to say. > >One thing I know is that bullshits can sometimes solve problems when >the field is actively lead by industry with lots of financial >incentives but BSs are nothing more than harm when the field is >shrinking and trying to converge on the minimal set of quality work >that survives. > >People already had enough ugly fights when pure-silver was split, and >when name callers left (only to rejoin a few months later). Many >people were already disappointed to see that aspect of this community >but I further learned that the group wasn't getting any better. It's >time to cut my losses. I won't share any information with this list >in the future. > >-- >Ryuji Suzuki >"Keep a good head and always carry a light camera." >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your=20 >account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you=20 >subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.