[projectaon] Re: Few more 17tdoi errors

  • From: "Jonathan Blake" <blake.jon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:48:54 -0700

On 4/13/05, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jennifer Sigman wrote:

> (??) 17tdoi 96: [js: Are Kajarda undead?  Also, missing the link to 213.]
(ne) [so: I'd guess the Kajarda are undead, so footnote req'd. Also: turh ->
turn and encode as link.]

Footnoted 96, 125, and 287.

> (??) 17tdoi 130, 264: This undead creature is immune to Mindblast and
> Kai-surge.  -> But not Psi-surge? ;-)
(ne) [so: An odd one. I think Joe started using this phrase for people who began
reading the LW books at #13, because they never really got to use Psi-surge. 
Jon?]

*startles* What? Oh, right, right. Um... if we're confused, readers will be confused.

Also changed 264 and 281. Should this immunity include Kai-blast as
well? (cf. Section 310)

> (??) 17tdoi 264: In section 130, the book mentions Cabalah are undead.  Need
> to mention it here.
(ft) [so: Will require the standard undead footnote.]

It _is_ mentioned. Is this an erratum we failed to note on the list?

--
Jon

Other related posts: