The formatting codes in those .brf files when done with duxbury at least start out with a $ followed by non-blank characters and end with a blank character. Those files are the equivalent of compositor's tapes for braille books and would be run through classes of braille production equipment like the elinfa and led120. Those files can be any grade of braille but will have $g2 for Grade 2 braille as one of their first format codes to tell the equipment how to operate. If a user has duxbury on their computer, along with a dumb electronic brailler they can run the .brf file through duxbury and out the printer port. Duxbury would then take control of the dumb electronic brailler and produce correctly formatted braille. As a consequence of the formatting codes .brf files are larger than .brl files based on this overhead. If a user downloads and uses a .brl file which is one long line, they can also run that through duxbury and set duxbury up with another file to control how that .brl file gets brailled. That's been a long time since I had any contact with duxbury. Rot47: <;F56]52D9:6==@?2GJ]>:=> -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Hubert Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 14:04 To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Difference between .brf and .brl files Hi Jamal, BRF stands for "formatted braille", which means that the file is ready to print in a certain format like 30 cells by 27 lines, whereas BRL files are often files with just one long line per paragraph. This is what I have seen at some libraries which offer files to download. Wolfgang __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind