On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 07:30 -0400, Jaromir Capik wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I recently found a strange piece of code in stat2proc > function located in the proc/readproc.c source file. > There's a sscanf function having 39 format alements, > but only 33 argument elements. It seems that 6 of them > were commented out, but the format string remained > untouched. So ... it's pretty possible, that some > of the fields have a wrong format specifier due > to the shift caused by commenting some arguments out. > > Does anybody know why it's like that? > > Thanks, > Jaromir. Hi Jaromir, You forget to subtract the 6 placeholders. (the '*' assignment-suppression specifiers) Regards, Jim