[procps] Re: Fixes to argument parsing in GitLab

  • From: Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:30:43 +1000

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:

I posted some fixes to argument parsing in a GitLab pull request:
https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/merge_requests/3
I just want to make sure that is not being overlooked since the recent
move to GitLab...
Nope, I've just been busy; not sure what the others are doing.

I probably have a few more fixes to argument parsing, there's some
refactoring to do with the signal arguments (-9, -KILL, etc.) which are
used from more than one place, we should also not recognize those after a
Be careful, we've broken this bit of code more often than once. Ideally
I'd like to have some more tests for these sort of things.

-- which indicates end of the options and the support for process groups
Good idea, gets around is it -9 for kill or -9 for process group 9.

patches for that, in which case, should I keep posting them to GitLab?
Gitlab is the place, sorry for the quiet.

- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. procps
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2015