[pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- From: "BiPolar" <BiPolar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pedevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:51:32 -0300 ART
Oliver Tappe wrote:
> I suggest that we either come up with a convention (e.g. always use
> user-set 4 for API keywords in all keyword-files) or we make that explicit
> by adding one or more user-sets that are properly named (e.g.: API-types,
> API-functions, etc.). Just using a convention is (much) less work, I
> suppose...
My vote goes to named user's sets.
Oscar.
- References:
- [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- From: Oliver Tappe
Other related posts:
- » [pedevel] keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- » [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- [pedevel] Re: keywords.cpp with BeOS API symbols
- From: Oliver Tappe