Oh not at all <G> I think we're probably in violent agreement <chuckle> I certainly would not dispute that unplugging is better than not unplugging when you know there is a storm about. On the other hand, I strongly recommend a surge protector when you are plugged in. Regards from Bob -- the "Keyboard Cowboy", ,,,,,,,, Ô¿Ô¬ Cincinnati, Ohio Scottsdale, Arizona ==========<[0]>=========== Tuesday 2/28/2006 9:27:26 PM "Life is Tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid." -- John Wayne ==========<[O]>========== On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:27:08 +1300, DH (Rick) Holmes wrote: | Hi, Bob, | | I agree with all you say here, but would add that to rely on | commonly found surge protectors as guard against lightning and | therefore not unplugging is not a totally sound belief. As you | say, a lightning 'force field' is virtually unstoppable. In turn | this may cause a surge elsewhere as circuits disabled by the | strike attempt to restore their services. I have been aware of | surges occurring when a car hits a powerpole and brings down a | power line! | | Destruction of computer data and programs is extremely unlikely | when plugs are removed, and this includes modem cables connected | to phone lines. | | For the best 'within safety' protection I have a '40gb pocket HDD' | to back everything up, and most times this is disconnected from my | computer and hopefully no passage of mega-volts will pass through | it.as there's no escape to earth. I won't try for any additional | security under present conditions. | | I hope you won't regard this as an argument against your | statement. I just as this for the information of the uninitiated. | | All the best | | Rick H | Keyboard Cowboy wrote: | | Actually, I'd add to that Rick. The real purpose for a surge | | protector is to take a certain amount of spike charge. It's | | measured on joules (sp?) vs. time. Some are better than others. | | Most work well for normal surges in line activity, whether | | caused by electrical storms or by problems with the power | | provided to your home. Additionally, these surge protectors | | have a limited life. After so many charges, they begin to | | degrade and should be replaced. When your surge protector is | | tripped a few times, it might be a good idea to replace it. Now | | a direct, or very near hit from lightning will not, as you | | said, be protected by a surge protector. Such a near hit will | | cause a "force field" of electricity that it can affect the | | electrical devices --even if not plugged in--. Obviously an | | unplugged device is far less likely to be damaged, but it can | | be damaged. About seven years ago when I was building my | | house in Cincinnati I was also building a HAM radio room and | | did quite a bit of research on lightning. What I found was | | that to have a high degree of confidence in protection, I would | | actually have to build a grid in the walls of the room to "soak | | up" any electrical charges. I didn't go that far, but I put a | | hell of a ground system in the house, and on the tower near by. | | | | Regards from | | | | Bob -- the "Keyboard Cowboy", | | | | -- | <Please delete this line and everything below.> | | To unsub or change your email settings: | //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk | | To access our Archives: | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ | //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ -- <Please delete this line and everything below.> To unsub or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/