[pchelpers] Re: Fact---Emails unreliable

  • From: John Durham <john.modec@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:41:10 +1300

Good article. The findings are consistant with the performance of xtra's 
s-p-a-m blocker. That is why I have all the suspect messages delivered 
to their own folder so I don't miss vital mail. On the white listing 
question, Mozilla has a junk mail system that can be set to pass any 
mail if the sender's address is in your address book. Think of it as a 
built in white list. Look under Tools/Junk mail controls for it.

Tonia wrote:

>Hi
> 
> 
>I used to wonder why I have not been receiving emails I was supposed to 
>receive. Now I know I'm not the only victim!  Read Langa's test result here: 
> 
> 
>http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=17300016
> 
> 
>Regards
> 
> 
>Tonia
>

-- 
Regards, John Durham <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
ICQ number 112663246
Fax/Phone 64 4 5286786
Award winning web site at http://modecideas.com?sig
Order my latest e-book at http://modecideas.com/dmaxhits.htm?sig
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.



Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at //www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.

Other related posts: