[patriots] Re: The Third Rome

  • From: "Chris Pead" <cpead@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:50:25 +0100

Yes, quite right Jack - I will look around to see if there are any
reasonably priced copies on offer - Chris

 

From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jack Lewis
Sent: 12 September 2014 08:16
To: patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [patriots] Re: The Third Rome

 

I am not in the least surprised now about these kind of revelations.
Everything I previously knew about Russia and its Czars and Queens had been
written by those well known parasites and their Communist off-spring.
Naturally the Czars and Queens would have been made out to be rulers of the
worst kind. This was because they refused to allow International banksters
to operate in Russia and the Russian Revolution was the price they paid. 

The truth behind the history is always censored by those who write it and
who are usually the winners - generally not by right but by might,

I think this this a book worth reading.

Jack



On 11/09/2014 23:25, Chris Pead wrote:


The Third Rome


The Reviews


In Matthew Raphael Johnson's keen The Third Rome, I got Russian history for
the first time. 

Until I cracked his book on Holy Russia, my knowledge of the Czars was
cursory.  None of the campuses where I studied had a thing to say about
them.  Pre-Bolshevik Russia was all hush-hush.  Post-Bolshevik USSR was
hush-hush too.  They didn't teach us about Marxism.  Not a peep.  They
didn't dare mention the Bolsheviks. 

A scholar of history might ask, "Why the hell not?"  Why was The Communist
Manifesto not on our reading list?

Johnson introduces the Christian Czars one by one in scholarly biographies -
emphasizing that we have been fed lies about them.  Ivan wasn't so terrible
and Peter wasn't so great.  Catherine was too much of a team-player in
western ways.  Her reign was as good as she was pretty.

Then came the Romanovs.  Among the finest men and monarchs of all time.
Ushering into Russia a golden age of prosperity, cultural genius and
Christian solidarity.  

Long-maligned serfdom had its niche in Holy Russia.  Peasants owned most of
the land.  They went to the same priests as their noble neighbors to lay
bare their souls.  They were self-governing communes with every head of
household having a voice goodly-heard.

Peasants had bargaining power with their respected yield.  They were the
hearty voice of wheat, rye and barley in the field.  Peasant communes were
the firm foundation of Russian economy.  And they were cherished by their
Czar as mutually as they loved him.

A quote from Margaret Mitchell's novel comes to mind, "A man is nothing
without land, Katie-Scarlet."  The Russian peasant was one with his land.  A
strapping, vigorous and devoutly Christian people from whose multitude rose
the Cossack Host.  Great defenders of the Crown.   "God, King and Country,"
hip-hip to that.  God-fearing monarchy is the only form of government where
everybody benefits. 

Johnson's book refutes the lies written about Holy Russia by its Marxist
enemies.  Ones that have wormed their way into academe and pass for
"history."  He writes that democracy is just a cover word for oligarchy.
Other such words are used as duck blinds for "the masses."  Examples of
which are:  proletariat, bourgeoisie and abattoir.  Who can spell them?
Note how Marxists use French to hide the meaning of poor wage-slave, middle
class wage-slave and slaughterhouse, respectively. 

So Russia rose in military might and economic solvency.  She refused to
"westernize" and open her door to international bankers.  Therein lies the
rub.

I can list other nation states that have suffered similar fates.  Bloody
revolutions every one.  And every one of them instigated by the same pack of
rats that murdered the last Czar of Russia, his family and their little dog.

This book is a must-read for anyone who thinks they know some history.  The
author is a Russian Orthodox priest whose work has appeared in the Barnes
Review and several other books.


Related


Lebensraum <http://shpearson.wordpress.com/2010/09/29/lebensraum/> In "The
Reviews"

Natasha <http://shpearson.wordpress.com/2011/07/06/natasha/> In "Prose"

For My Legionaries
<http://shpearson.wordpress.com/2013/09/30/for-my-legionaries/> In "The
Reviews"

This entry was posted on April 1, 2012 at 5:47 am and is filed under The
Reviews <http://shpearson.wordpress.com/category/the-reviews/> . You can
follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0
<http://shpearson.wordpress.com/2012/04/01/the-third-rome/feed/>  feed.
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback
<http://shpearson.wordpress.com/2012/04/01/the-third-rome/trackback/>  from
your own site. 

 

 

Kind regards,

 

Chris

 

 


  _____  


 <http://www.avast.com/> 

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
<http://www.avast.com/>  protection is active. 

 

 



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

Other related posts: