I have deleted the long and possibly entertaining other narrative and left in
the meat of the argument.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julius Legatus <imperatorxgemina@xxxxxxxxx>
The Lancaster Plan
by John M. Joyce (December 2015)
Could something like Paris happen here in the U.K? In London? Perhaps in one of
our other cities – one with a large Muslim population such as Birmingham or
Bradford? Speculation about the probable future actions of the fifth columnists
that were now scattered throughout our land grew ever more fevered as the night
wore on. The consensus was that we were, and would remain for the foreseeable
future, at risk and that the Islamic violence in western societies would
gradually increase as the years went by.Then, quietly and with good manners –
almost apologetically, one of our fellow guests disagreed with us. He stated
quite plainly that the situation in Britain would not be allowed to get out of
hand as had happened, in his humble opinion, on the continent. What was more,
he asserted, the British government had a Plan to keep the Muslim situation in
the U.K. under control, and had had such a Plan in place since it was drawn up
under the Blair Labour government back in 2005, after the bombings in London,
when it had been known as the Lancaster Plan, named, he explained, after John
of Gaunt who, although never king himself, sired the line of English Kings that
came after him, kings who kept England together and at the forefront of world
developments., he informed us. The Lancaster Plan contained several different
provisions that could be brought into play to defuse the threat of Islamic
violence in the U.K. the first two provisions of the Lancaster Plan had
already been activated and were proving to be successful. Further provisions
could be activated when necessary and in that way Muslim violence in Britain
could be contained or minimised, or maybe even staved off indefinitely if the
plan came to be implemented in its entirety.
The first stage was, so he said, the careful use of legislation to make any
criticism of Islam, or Muslims, almost impossible. Many in government, he
stated, were a little upset that in order to do that they had also made it
legally very difficult to criticise other faiths such as Christianity or
Hinduism, but their concerns about this had dissipated over recent years as it
had become obvious that the police and the judiciary simply treated any
criticism of a faith other than Islam, or criticism of a believer other than a
Muslim, as being far less serious than criticism of Islam itself or of Muslims.
The careful positioning by many NGOs, and left-wing thinkers, of criticism of
Islam and Muslims as racist had not been entirely co-incidental either, so he
averred, but had been initiated and encouraged by government officials in
furtherance of the first stage of the Lancaster Plan.The first stage of the
Plan had been a success in that the Muslim population of the U.K. had taken
full advantage of it to assert their uniqueness and to demand the respect that
they felt was their due, the man said calmly. They were kept occupied and
diverted by this and, as a consequence Muslim violence in Britain had been kept
to a minimum – indeed, some Muslims felt, as this stage of the Plan, that so
much progress could be made without their usual tool of violence that they even
informed on those who were planning to perpetrate horrific acts on the streets
of Britain. Viewed in those terms, the first stage of the Plan had to be
considered a success.As you can imagine, I’m sure, we were not surprised by the
fact of such manipulation – we were, and are, all aware just how successive
U.K. governments have curtailed freedom of speech to the point where it no
longer exists in Britain –.Stage two, he informed us, had also been put into
effect, but it was only an experiment in devolving power to small areas of the
U.K. – Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (Ulster) – whilst still keeping the
U.K. together as a type of politically whole unit. This was so that structures
could be put in place to continuously manage that type of change. This would
enable, he told us, the granting of some degree of autonomy, in an orderly and
managed fashion, to various Muslim enclaves around the country when this became
necessary. Precedents for devolution would have been established and the change
could therefore be managed easily and without too much fuss from the general
population. The whole Plan was really about managing the changes that the
Muslims in the U.K. will keep demanding.He went on to say that further stages
of the Lancaster Plan envisaged granting these enclaves the right to implement
their own laws, such as sharia law, granting Muslims the right to travel
between these enclaves but remain subject only to the laws within them while so
doing and expanding the enclaves as the need arose. The final stages of the
Plan, he informed us casually, foresaw the need to alter the laws outwith the
enclaves as they became bigger and more powerful in the national parliament –
repealing such things as the laws that decriminalised homosexuality, the laws
that granted equal rights to women and the laws that made all religions equal.
The death penalty would have to be re-introduced and it would become necessary
to assert in law the primacy of Islam and the superior position of Muslims in
the U.K, but by the time that that would have to happen Muslims would
constitute at least thirty percent, and more probably fifty percent, of the
population. If the current government plans for the increased immigration of
Muslims stayed on course then there should be no trouble in reaching that
percentage in about fifteen years time, he told us. That would also ensure
Britain having good links to the rest of the Islamic world through family and
clan ties. The Plan was quite plain about the necessity of confusing and
misdirecting the current population about immigration by distracting it with
constant talk about refugees and overseas aid and other such trivia that could
be magnified out of all proportion.Such changes would occur incrementally and
the formulators of the Plan believed that each small change would pass almost
unchallenged for each as it happened would affect only a tiny number of people,
or an easily despised minority such as gay people. Eventually, he said, it
would become necessary for someone in the line of succession to the throne to
convert to Islam, but by the time that that would become necessary there would
be very few among the ruling elite, or the class of people represented by those
of us at this party, who wouldn’t already have converted simply because it
would be expedient to do so.The Plan made provision for, so he claimed, the
gradual changing of the law to conform with the requirements of Islam. No great
changes at any one given moment were envisaged and the U.K. would continue to
be a powerful country and it was planned that those who currently occupied
positions of power or influence, or those who were moneyed and landed, or those
who were successful professional people, would still occupy the same positions
in society after the changes that the Plan would help to manage as they had at
the start of the process. Simply put, he explained, the semi-autonomous Muslim
enclaves would be expanded gradually until they covered more or less the entire
country. Beloved churches would be converted to mosques, important museums
would gradually edit their collections in accordance with Islamic law, art
galleries would slowly die as their grants were shrunk and then withdrawn, but
the changes would be gradual and seen by most as inevitable and necessary. The
scourge of terrorist violence would, in this way, be kept at bay in Britain
and, with the minor adjustment to an Islamic way of life, things would go on
pretty much as usual.The Lancaster Plan was the best provision that could be
made for managing the process of the inevitable change of the U.K. from a
successful secular-cum-Christian country to a successful Islamic country.
clearly identified that Islam is winning in the west and we must make sure that
the U.K. is preserved as best we can and, if possible, comes out on top. That’s
what good government is about, he told us, making plans to ensure that we
continue to survive in some way and with minimum disruption. The best way to
make sure that we survive the approaching Islamic conquest was to encourage and
manage the process of Islamification, and that should ensure that the U.K.
remains a successful, independent, homologous, united political unit, albeit a
Muslim one, he added, but still successful and still the U.K. someone asked him
about the human rights implications and that he replied that, naturally, the
Lancaster Plan allowed for the formal adoption of the Cairo Declaration of
Human Rights in Islam at the appropriate and necessary moment, and that that
should sufficiently muddy the waters and confuse people for long enough to
allow the process envisaged in the Plan to continue smoothly. The important
thing, he said, the one thing that people must never lose sight of, is the
survival of Britain – it doesn’t matter what religion dominates, Islam,
Christianity, secularism, they’re all as bad as one another. What matters is
that the U.K. survives. The Lancaster Plan practically guarantees our survival,
he asserted, and it’s a great Plan. We should be thankful that we have had
governments far-sighted enough to see that and to draw it up.
Furthermore, we argued back at him, the very existence of the Lancaster Plan in
itself undermines any attempt to rally our peoples in defence of our secular,
liberal democracies, for anybody who tries to do so will immediately be
perceived as a threat to the orderly transition that the Plan seeks to bring
about. The people executing the provisions of the Plan will have no alternative
but to try to stop, by any means possible, anybody who chooses the path of
resistance over the provisions of the Plan because he, or she, will represent,
as they would see it, a serious threat to the continued existence of the U.K.
In other words, we argued, the very existence of the Lancaster Plan guarantees
that Britain will become an Islamic state, whereas without it we might have had
a chance to remain free. Anyway, we added, the U.K. would not survive; all that
would be there in the end would be one more Islamic hell-hole that looked like
the old U.K. but had none, not one, of its values and certainly none of its
rich and ancient culture.He continued to disagree and the discussion, perfectly
friendly, perfectly polite and punctuated by shafts of wit and wisdom on both
sides, My comment. Possibly true but the supposed formulators of the plan were
just puppets of the NWO or City of London. It does explain why we do not have
the same problems as in other countries of which you may be unaware unless you
seek it out. The marches and rioting on the streets in continental Europ.
This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected
by Avast. www.avast.com
