[patriots] Re: Fwd: Re: Advertisement

From: "Rays1" <rayspost@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:11:41 +0100

Jack,

 

I dont have the graphic skills but I'm sure you get the drift?

 

 

 

Ray

 

 

From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jack Lewis
Sent: 14 September 2014 23:47
To: ECG; Patriots
Subject: [patriots] Re: Fwd: Re: Advertisement

 

How about this one?

Jack

a

On 14/09/2014 19:06, ECG wrote:

 

 

From the 1st Nov the EU introduces QMV and Westminster looses the VETO on  43 
important  areas of legislation. (See link to the link below).  

 

Perhaps a picture of the House of Westminster with a large EU Flag flying above 
it or encircled with the stars would make a hard hitting visual. 

 

Beneath it wording to the effect that (the Traitors in) Westminster have from 
the 1st Nov handed the country over to a foreign power in contravention of our 
Constitution. 

 

link to list of legislation we have no further control over 
http://pjcjournal.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/uk-parliament-comes-to-an-effective-end/




Gloria 






On 14/09/2014, at 10.28, "ECG" <ecg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It occurred to me that perhaps something like 

WHO RULES YOU?

WESTMINSTER GOVERNMENT?

THINK AGAIN!

IT’S THE EU IN BRUSSELS.

HOW?

YOUR GOVERNMENT ILLEGALLY HANDED THEM POWER OVER YOU.

LEFT YOU AT THE MERCY OF FOREIGN LAWS AND EXTRADITION TO ANY COUNTRY WITH NO 
PROOF REQUIRED OF OFFENCE!

 

Jane

 

From: ECG <mailto:ecg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 2:06 PM

To: ECG <mailto:ecg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

Subject: Fwd: RE: Advertisement

 

 

 

I very much agree with you, Paul in respect of hitting points, like a hammer, 
as in your illustrative layout.

 

Such hard-hitting type of, "Bang, Bang", in-ya-face, kind of points like that 
seems to me to be whats

needed in order to try to get a meaningful message across in a one-off 
advert...and esp when just the

'one-shot' may be all we can reasonably expect or manage at this time, then 
it's VITAL to pack as much punch as 

possible into it.

 

However, - just my own personal view - but, I don't think your suggestion that 
the wording of the first point

might be .........

"Your Laws are intended to protect the people - The Law

is being used to attack and destroy people"

 

The reason I say this is because most will not understand what you are talking 
about nor what Law you are

referring to. They will just casually turn the page if the meaning does not 
instantly grab their attention

 

If you tell them the more basic truths that THEY  THEMSELVES, as individuals, 
are now subject to Euro arrest

by any Euro country (even without any proof) then it may hit home much more 
so...simply provide a hyper-link

reference to that truth....dont waste the advert space by attempting to "prove" 
what we already know

 

Overall, I think your page 4 is the best yet, and needs only to be brushed-up 
by the more expert amongst us 

in terms of such law and grammar etc

 

 

ATB

 

 

Ray

 

 

 

 

From: ECG [mailto:ecg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 12 September 2014 14:45
To: ECG
Subject: Fwd: Advertisement

 

Further to the last email on the subject, may I suggest something along the 
lines of page 4 of the attached.
 
Paul Talbot-Jenkins

Attachment: Traitors.pub
Description: application/vnd.ms-publisher

References:
- [patriots] Re: Fwd: Re: Advertisement
  - From: Jack Lewis

[patriots] Re: Fwd: Re: Advertisement

Other related posts: