[patriots] FW: For Baroness Royall Please,

From: john TIMBRELL <johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:42:00 +0000
Please patriots take time to read the below and send similar letters to people 
in power that you know. I did hear a male MP I think from Essex explaining that 
our constituion would need amending because of the Scottish promises. He sould 
be written to to try and get him to agree the true constitution position. JohnT
 
From: johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx
To: contactholmember@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: For Baroness Royall Please,
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:37:29 +0000




Dear Janet,
                     The constitution has been mentioned on the news today 
after the Scottish Referendum more than I have heard in years.
I note that you have spoken in the house of Lords on this subject.
It is possible that you may be able to help me on this subject but I fear that 
you will be restrained by other forces to stop you getting  the truth discussed 
in the Lords.
 
Our constitution developed over hundreds of years which achieved an effective 
and moral balance between parliament the king or queen and the rights of the 
common man.
This constitution was codified by the Americans in their written constitution.
 
The difficulty in the present constitution reform proposal is that they can 
only talk around the subject because they will not acknowledge the presence of 
the elephant in the room.
The elephant is that  Edward Heath ignored the attorney general's advice that 
signing the treaty of Rome would be unconstitutional because it gave away our 
sovereignty to a foreign power and it would be treason to do so. Edward Heath 
kept this secret using the 30 year rule by which time more treaties were signed 
giving away more of our sovereignty.
 
Because any government has refused to acknowledge this illegality we find 
ourselves in a situation where uncontrolled immigration has overwhelmed all our 
public services. Had our population been managed correctly using our own laws 
it would not have surged by 10 million over ten years. No wonder our public 
services are creaking under the strain to the extent that the police cannot 
control serious crimes, and social services also cover up crimes to try and 
avoid being classed as incompetent.
 
Even parliament assists in this process by covering up inadequacies by using 
the knowledge of MP paedophiles to blackmail whistle blowers. You know that if 
Leon Brittan was prosecuted it would bring down the government because even the 
prime minister is part of the cover up.
We have an election next May so I believe it would be a good time to force 
these issues into the open . It needs doing because the rule of law has broken 
down as lie is built on the lie that Edward Heath started.
 
The bottom line is the rule of law. The rule of law quite clearly stated in our 
constitution reinforced by statute. The many recent statutes have gone against 
our constitution and are in effect unlawful but the judges will not discuss 
this because they also have paedophiles amongst them who are being blackmailed 
into silence.
 
Are you strong enough to raise this subject in parliament so that whoever sits 
on the woolsack is forced to rule on our common law constitution.
Could you get an honest senior judge in the Lords to back you. 
This country is going backwards because parliament cannot work as it should. 
Would you consider using your position to get the constitution reform committee 
to discuss the subject. The committee will be a farce if they do not.
 
Sincerely John Timbrell
[patriots] FW: For Baroness Royall Please,

Other related posts:
