Re: temporary tablespace

From: Mladen Gogala <mladen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:05:54 -0500

It depends. If you can create sort_area_size that can dynamically
autoallocate larger and larger chunks of memory, then go ahead, create
autoallocate temporary tablespace. If your sort_area_size is fixed,  
then you should create temporary tablespace with the uniform extent
size.

On 01/29/2004 02:54:37 PM, Jeffrey Beckstrom wrote:
> Is it better to create the temporary tablespace with uniform
> allocation or autoallocate.
> 
> 
> 
> Jeffrey Beckstrom
> Database Administrator
> Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
> 1240 W. 6th Street
> Cleveland, Ohio 44113
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:

Re: temporary tablespace
From: Tim Gorman

References:
- temporary tablespace
  - From: Jeffrey Beckstrom

Re: temporary tablespace

Other related posts: