Re: raid 5 protection vs non-raided multiplexing
- From: "David Sharples" <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: stellr@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:17:19 +0000
well if you mutiplex at the file level, you have prtection against
acidentally deleting a file for example.
With one you are only protected for disk failure
On 3/20/06, Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My question is about the redundancy of the control/redo dbf. What is
the statistical argument for running with one control file on a 5 disk/
raid 5 vs splitting the array and duplexing the to different filesystems
on stand-alone disks?
Other related posts:
