RE: pricing

  • From: "Zelli, Brian" <Brian.Zelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: MARK BRINSMEAD <mark.brinsmead@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:52:22 +0000

Ok, it seems that the processor licensing looks to be the way to go but how do 
you figure that out?  I’m looking at all these charts and none of it is making 
any sense.  They talk processors, and we talk cores and cpus.  What’s what?  
From my unix guy he says 2 cpus and 2 cores.  So I multiplied to 4.  How does 
that convert to processors?


Brian


From: MARK BRINSMEAD [mailto:mark.brinsmead@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:47 PM
To: Zelli, Brian
Cc: oracle-l (oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: pricing

Hold on there.  Its nowhere near that easy.
There is a per-processor MINIMUM for named-user-plus licensing.  For EE 
products, the minimum is 25 named users per processor, which works out in most 
cases to 50% the price of CPU licenses.  That -- of course -- is a minimum.  
There is no maximum.
Further, the rules for who/what constitutes a "named user" are less than 
simple.  Under Oracle's rules, when you use "multiplexing" devices (e.g., TP 
monitors, like "Tuxedo", or web-based application servers) you must count the 
users on the outside of the multiplexing device.
In an extreme case, this means that if you have applications running on an 
internet-accessible web server that accesses your database, you could be 
required to license about seven billion named users, even though the web server 
has only a single database connection and uses only a single database account.
When licensing EE products, I think it may be wiser to purchase CPU licenses 
rather than named-user licenses.  It is far easier to demonstrate compliance 
with CPU licenses, and the upside to named users (a maximum 50% cost saving) is 
often outweighed by the potential downside (basically unlimited license 
liability).

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Zelli, Brian 
<Brian.Zelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Brian.Zelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Ok, it has been a while since I had to price out the oracle licensing.  When I 
go the oracle website, it shows me two options, Processor or  Named User.  Is 
that still correct?  We were on Named User and probably wish to stay on that.   
So it says that Named User is $950 per user.  So none of the cpu, cores or 
other internals matter?  Just the $950 times the quantity will be my price?


Brian


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent 
responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you 
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this 
email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your 
computer. Thank you.



This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
  • References:

Other related posts: