Re: performance. 7 queries independent queries takes 3s with union all in view 98s

  • From: Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco <jcdrpllist@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: mvshelton <mvshelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:20:58 -0400

Thank you

To try I doubled the pga_aggregate_target, and it didn't fixed, in theory I
should reduce the memory because hash happens when there is a lot of
memory, as I remember.
So I tried to reduce the pga_aggregate_target and memory_target and the
problem is the same.

Based on the article of Iggy I added the hint

/*+ NO_QUERY_TRANSFORMATION */ and nothing.

disables alter system set "_optimizer_cost_based_transformation" = off ;

I remember it was of no use but I tried too
alter system set "_optimizer_max_permutations"=3000;

and either, any idea is welcome, thank you :)



2015-10-21 15:08 GMT-04:00 mvshelton <mvshelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

If your hash joins are slower are you sorting to disk, if so you may need
to increase your pga.

Matt


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S™ III, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Iggy Fernandez
Date:10/21/2015 2:51 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: jcdrpllist@xxxxxxxxx, ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: performance. 7 queries independent queries takes 3s with
union all in view 98s

The answer should leap out right out of the query plan

Perhaps there's join factorization going on. See
https://blogs.oracle.com/optimizer/entry/optimizer_transformations_join_factorization

But the best bet is to examine the query plan.

Iggy

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:47:18 -0400
Subject: performance. 7 queries independent queries takes 3s with union
all in view 98s
From: jcdrpllist@xxxxxxxxx
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello if you can help please
I found something very interesting, I tested two times to be sure. 11.2.0.3

There is a view having 7 queries joined with union all
query1
union all
query2
union all
...

When executed in the view all 7 takes 98s
If in the same view I put only one query at a time I get 3s total, the
query is unchanged

The problem is using a hash join instead of nested loops

1 1.38s
2 0.04s
3 1.11s
4 0.05s
5 0.35s
6 0.02s
7 0.09s

all 7 98x

Thank you :)



Other related posts: