Re: enq HW - contention waits

  • From: "Ravi Gaur" <ravigaur1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: krish.hariharan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:12:00 -0500

Thanks, Krish. The extent size is 64k.

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:57 PM, <krish.hariharan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Ravi,
>
>
>
> We have run very intense loads on a large DW and I don't remember running
> into this problem (same version and OS). Not having seen this event, If I
> were to go out on a limb, I would say that that seems to suggest that there
> are too many extents being allocated to accommodate growth. What is the next
> extent size for the table?
>
>
>
> -Krish
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ravi Gaur
> *Sent:* Friday, April 18, 2008 2:34 PM
> *To:* oracle-l
> *Subject:* enq HW - contention waits
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> We have a production database running on RAC (4-node) (10.2.0.3 on Solaris
> 10) and I'm noticing a lot of waits on "enq: HW - contention". Doing a bit
> of researching tells me that it is related to HWM extensions (concurrent
> inserts). We have no control on the application so I wonder what could be
> done from the database end to tune this up (if anything). Here's what I see
> from the AWR during the time it showed up --
>
> Top 5 Timed Events
>
> *Event*
>
> *Waits*
>
> *Time(s)*
>
> *Avg Wait(ms)*
>
> *% Total Call Time*
>
> *Wait Class*
>
> CPU time
>
>
>
> 7,148
>
>
>
> 43.5
>
>
>
> enq: HW - contention
>
> 67,034
>
> 5,263
>
> 79
>
> 32.0
>
> Configuration
>
> SQL*Net break/reset to client
>
> 61,006
>
> 1,504
>
> 25
>
> 9.2
>
> Application
>
> db file sequential read
>
> 152,431
>
> 885
>
> 6
>
> 5.4
>
> User I/O
>
> gc cr block busy
>
> 34,315
>
> 490
>
> 14
>
> 3.0
>
> Cluster
>
>
> Any help is deeply appreciated!!
>
> TIA,
> - Ravi Gaur
>

Other related posts: