Re: db_file_mutliblock_read_count and physical IO

  • From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:39:51 -0600

tkprof summarizes and for "disk IO" it counts the number of blocks read, 
not the number of physical I/O. So if you have 1 scattered read that read 
128 blocks, or 16 scattered read that each read 8 blocks, tkprof will 
report 128 "disk IO"
That is one of the (many) reasons Cary advocates to look at the raw 
extended sql trace.

At 08:25 AM 8/18/2004, you wrote:
>I did a 10046 trace and verified that I can get up to 128 blocks/IO with 
>db_file_multiblock_read_count.
>How do I metric this? I look at my total physical IOs when I did a tkprof 
>report and my total number of physical IOs remained the same when I had 
>the value set to 8 as when I had it set to 128?
>Before I did this test, my assumption was:
>'Oracle  would do less total Physical IOs since I am retrieving more 
>blocks per IO.'
>That assumption proved false. Can someone explain why?

Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: