Re: Single ASM instance for non-RAC and RAC instances in a node ?
- From: "jayaraj rengarajan" <jayaraj.rengarajan@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Dan Norris" <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:44:38 -0500
Dan:
If so, can we use +ASM1 (node1) while creating non-RAC instance in that node
using DBCA ? this instance will use DiskGroups mapped to +ASM1
In our Production landscape, we prefer not to host RAC database for smaller
application databases , which won't contribute much load on the server or
resource intensive.
Thanks
Jay
On 11/21/07, Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sure. Having clustered ASM instances doesn't stop you from using those
> diskgroups for non-clustered databases.
>
> The larger question is: Why would you compromise the RAC instance on that
> node by making it compete for resources with some other instance? As we've
> reviewed multiple times here, Oracle's resource manager operates within an
> instance, not across instances on the node. So, you've got little ability to
> ensure that the RAC instance gets what it needs in this case.
>
> Dan
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: jayaraj rengarajan <jayaraj.rengarajan@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: oracle_l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 7:38:49 PM
> Subject: Single ASM instance for non-RAC and RAC instances in a node ?
>
> List Members:
>
> Can I map a non-RAC instance to a ASM instance (+ASM1 in node1 or +ASM2 in
> node2) which is already configured for RAC instances ?
>
> We are running 10.2.0.2 in Linux RHEL 4.
>
> Thanks
> Jay
>
>
Other related posts:
