RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: <Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:08:25 -0400
Guys,
I hope you don't mind answering this - I am sure I answered this at one =
time but now forgot the answer.
I have some SQL generating SQL but there are skipped lines so the =
commands do not look correct and I get=20
SP2-....unknown command.
What is the set command to change this behavior?
Thanks,
Paula
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Ruth Gramolini
- Re: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Daniel W. Fink
- RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Jared . Still
- Re[2]: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Jonathan Gennick
Other related posts:
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » Re: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » Re: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » Re: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- » RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Ruth Gramolini
- Re: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Daniel W. Fink
- RE: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Jared . Still
- Re[2]: SQL generating SQL - stupid question continued lines
- From: Jonathan Gennick