RE: SAP on Oracle doubts
- From: "Blanchard, William" <wblanchard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "goran bogdanovic" <goran00@xxxxxxxxx>, "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:36:07 -0600
Correct. What I meant by my "functional" comment was just that if you
can deal with the craptacular UI, the tight coupling to the database and
stupid transaction codes it will do what you want it to. You are
correct with your metaphor to describe SAP as "using a handsaw to fell a
tree".
WGB
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Goulet, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:29 AM
To: goran bogdanovic; ORACLE-L
Cc: jsidba@xxxxxxxxx; jo.holvoet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SAP on Oracle doubts
That's about the size of it. Someone made the comment that their
applications where "functional" which is true, similar to using a
handsaw to fell a tree. It's work, but there are better tools out
there.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
PAREXEL International
_____
From: goran bogdanovic [mailto:goran00@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:22 AM
To: ORACLE-L
Cc: jsidba@xxxxxxxxx; jo.holvoet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx; Goulet, Richard
Subject: Re: SAP on Oracle doubts
Thanks you all for answers.
You just confirmed my fears ... there are also other configuration
issues which I did't mention here since if this can't be resolved, no
point to bother for the rest - 'take it or leave it' ;-)
cheers,
goran
Other related posts:
