Re[2]: /*+ ULE*/ ???

  • From: Robert Eskridge <bryny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Gudmundur Josepsson" <gbj@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:49:57 -0500

Thanks!

G> This is a known bug in Oracle which ought to be fixed in 9i.

G> Gudmundur

G> ----- Original Message ----- 
G> From: "Robert Eskridge" <bryny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
G> To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
G> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 11:40 PM
G> Subject: /*+ ULE*/ ???


>> Oracle 8.1.7, Solaris 9.
>> 
>> A developer brought me a pl/sql procudure that had a select /*+RULE*/
>> hint in it. It was performing poorly (to the point of blowing out temp
>> space with an ORA-01652 error. When we looked at sql running in
>> v$sqltext, we saw that the hint had changed to /*+ ULE*/.
>> 
>> Cutting the select out and and running it in either TOAD or SQL*Plus
>> and performed well.  But in the procedure we messed around with it
>> and kept getting the ULE (and the resulting full table scans) until we
>> looked at the docs and put spaces everyhere ( /*+ RULE */ ).  Is this
>> well known behavior?  I'm wondering if I should scan all our
>> procedures for this syntax....
>> 
>> -rje

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts:

  • » Re[2]: /*+ ULE*/ ???