Re: RMAN Compression experiences

  • From: "Andrew Kerber" <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:04:22 -0600

Thats interesting.  That suggests to me that on a restore, RMAN is
decompressing the data on disk then writing to the destination (which would
take two write operations), but during a backup they are compressing it in
memory then writing to the destination (one write operation).  Or do I
misunderstand the implications?

On Jan 15, 2008 1:30 PM, Jack van Zanen <jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Nope, similar experience as you have
>
>
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Juan Miranda
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:18 AM
> *To:* oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RMAN Compression experiences
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I tried RMAN compression and  it seems to work fast (if you use parallel
> channels) and very eficiently.
>
> I get a compress ratio of 10 to 1.
>
>
>
> Anyone have some negative experiences (bugs,etc.)  working with it ??
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>



-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

Other related posts: