RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Christian.Antognini@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:28:11 -0700
What Oracle version?
You are right, I just tried it on 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3. Serves me
right. I was thinking of bug 3929552 and could have sworn I saw it as
fixed in one of the patchsets, or I assumed that it is fixed in
9.2.0.6 and up as there is a patch available for 9.2.0.5. In any
case, I didn't verify my assumption.
So you DO get silly histograms when using "size auto" or "size
skewonly". I gave dbms_stats more credit than it deserves.
At 10:49 AM 12/12/2006, Christian Antognini wrote:
> Note that you need to force the creation of the (silly) histogram
> because "size skewonly" or "size auto" do not gather histograms for
> unique columns.
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
- References:
- RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- From: Christian Antognini
Other related posts:
- » Poor performance with Histogram
- » Re: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- » Re: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- » RE: Poor performance with Histogram
> Note that you need to force the creation of the (silly) histogram > because "size skewonly" or "size auto" do not gather histograms for > unique columns.
- RE: Poor performance with Histogram
- From: Christian Antognini