Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- From: "Ghassan Salem" <salem.ghassan@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:27:14 +0200
David,
the log stdby will still be available, but not updated, until the physical
one resumes sending it's redologs.
rgds
On 6/2/06, David Sharples <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
well if the physical standby is unavailable, then your logical is also
unavailble - is that something you can cope eith?
Sending redo to a standby isnt really an overhead for the primary
On 02/06/06, Mark Strickland <strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Any reasons not to do that? Things we should consider?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Strickland
> Seattle, WA
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- From: David Sharples
- References:
- Logical Standby Database Question
- From: Mark Strickland
- Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- From: David Sharples
Other related posts:
- » Logical Standby Database Question
- » Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- » Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- » Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- » Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- » Re: Logical Standby Database Question
well if the physical standby is unavailable, then your logical is also unavailble - is that something you can cope eith?
Sending redo to a standby isnt really an overhead for the primary
On 02/06/06, Mark Strickland <strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Any reasons not to do that? Things we should consider? > > Regards, > > Mark Strickland > Seattle, WA > >
- Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- From: David Sharples
- Logical Standby Database Question
- From: Mark Strickland
- Re: Logical Standby Database Question
- From: David Sharples