Re: Index freelists
- From: Natural Join B.V. <lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:40:50 MET
I certainly agree.
especially the (new in 10g) support for globally hash-partitioned indexes is
great for this reason; if you are only concerned about index contention, leave
the table unpartitioned and only hash partition your index(es)...
Lex.
> ----- Original Message -----
> We both reached the conclusion the best approach to contention problems in
> situations like these (header block contention) is to hash partition as much
> as we can (and dare) and forget about fine-tuning segment-headers, freelists
> and all that jazz. Much better bang-for-buck of our time. Same applies to
> RAC and clustered situations where there may be block (or row) contention.
>
> Just hash partition the table + indexes over 50 or so splits and be done
> with it. 99 times out of 100 it's all you need to do, the remaining 1%
> you ask a guru to sort it out. Would you
agree?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
