Re: Denormalized for Performance
- From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Oracle-L Freelists <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 02:07:44 +0000
Let me add, I am referring to OLTP systems, not Data Warehouses.
Thanks,
Jared
On 11/9/05, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry for the somewhat off-topic here, but this is really
> the only place to ask this.
>
> I'm looking for cases where you may have purposely
> denormalized a table or tables for performance reasons.
>
> Things that come to mind are calculated fields, repeating
> groups, etc.
>
> If you reply, please supply enough detail so that I can
> reproduce the table structure. Some idea of the size
> of the table(s) in number of rows would also be helpful.
>
> If possible, please supply any testing information that
> made the case for denormalization.
>
> Please reply off-list.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>
>
>
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Denormalized for Performance
- From: Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco
- References:
- Denormalized for Performance
- From: Jared Still
Other related posts:
- » Denormalized for Performance
- » Re: Denormalized for Performance
- » Re: Denormalized for Performance
- Re: Denormalized for Performance
- From: Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco
- Denormalized for Performance
- From: Jared Still