I see no issue with this. I"m also fairly positive you can run your database via NFS provided you have the proper mount settings for your platform. ( I could be mistaken). I know some Security Admin's prefer the audit_file_dest be set to a secured location that the 'oracle' user can only write to and then have them reviewed by a third party. I'm not sure how Database Vault (or is it Audit Vault , or both) handles this situation. Bradd Piontek "Next to doing a good job yourself, the greatest joy is in having someone else do a first-class job under your direction." -- William Feather On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Ram Raman <veeeraman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > A follow up on this. Hopefully not a silly question. > > We are going to set up auditing with audit_trail=DB. We have > audit_sys_oprations=TRUE too. Is it OK to set the audit_file_dest at an NFS > location. I know it is not Ok to have a datafile in NFS. There is not enough > space in the $ORACLE_BASE mount point, otherwise I would set it there. The > audting is enabled by a third party product and administered by it. I > checked with the company and yet to receive information on how often they > clean out the 'audit_file_dest' and in what way. > > In the meanwhile, I want to make sure it is OK to have NFS for > audit_file_dest. I read in Oracle manual that it goes to $OH/rdbms/audit if > it by default (I assume it may happen if NFS is not avaialable, but NFS has > always been available in our case, so far). > > Venky. > > > > On 10/13/08, Nigel Thomas <nigel.cl.thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Ram >> >> Moving AUD$ to another tablespace has been answered on the list before - >> see //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/02-2004/msg02964.html which >> includes a couple of Metalink references. See also >> //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/06-2008/msg00681.html which >> recommends you also open an SR with Oracle to register their approval. >> >> >> Regards Nigel >> > >