Re: ASM - Active Passive role
- From: "LS Cheng" <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Dan Norris" <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:48:29 +0200
Hi Dan
I clustered ASM as well so the Failover time is shorter (just a bit).
Thanks
--
LSC
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In your case, did you set up ASM as clustered so that all DGs were
> available on all ASM instances at all times and the single-instance
> databases just failed over? Or did you actually fail over the disk groups as
> well?
>
> Dan
>
> LS Cheng wrote:
>
> I have done it in a few customers without problems.
>
> Multipath is not provided by Sun Cluster, it depends on the Storage you use
> or you can use Sun Native MPXIO
>
> On 8/14/08, Stalin <stalinsk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Anyone using ASM/clusterware on single databases in a active-passive
>> configuration. Most of our medium sized customer installations are
>> single databases in active-passive configuration using sun cluster
>> data services for automatic fail over. Wondering if we anyone using
>> ASM in this configuration successfully without the sun cluster part. I
>> believe you would still need sun cluster for multipathing as ASM
>> doesn't support it yet.
>>
>
Other related posts:
