For performance I would pick a single DB server for the same processors/RAM. RAC has some performance overhead. Not much, but some. Under 10g I had some difficult to diagnose performance problems, but those seem to have gone away under 11. For scalability RAC is the way to go ... throw servers at the problem and you can scale until the cows come home For reliability I lean toward a single server since, in my experience, RAC is harder to maintain and , at least under 10g, I found a couple of bugs I never saw under single server. For manageability single server beats RAC hands down. Fewer DBA's are exposed to RAC and there are just more steps to everything. It is also pretty easy to break a RAC by updating configuration files incorrectly. 2 node v 3 node. I don't really see the difference. You have all the headaches of RAC once you get second server involved. From a licensing and manageability I would stick with fewer nodes ... with 1 being ideal. The only question I would have is how can you get the greatest amount of RAM and CPU to Oracle... If you can do it in 2 servers ... use 2. If you need 3 servers ...go 3. Steve _____ From: k srinivas [mailto:k.sridba@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:26 PM To: ora-apps-dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kirby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: 2node/3node RAC Hi Steve, I have already put a question ...I want to know is it better to go for 3node or 2node RAC keeping in my mind scalability and performance. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Steve Kirby <kirby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Is there a question you want to ask? Steve _____ From: ora-apps-dba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ora-apps-dba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of k srinivas Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:49 AM To: ora-apps-dba Subject: 2node/3node RAC Hi All, We are on EBS 11.5.10.2 and on 10G RAC having 2 db nodes. We are planning to migrate to 3 node RAC .I have 1 doubt for scalability and performance wise is it better to have 2 node or 3 node RAC,Keeping in point our Prod OLTP DB size is 8TB . Thanks in advance ..