[optimal] Re: Ophthalmic Technician training & certification
- From: "Kuhn, Lisa" <lkuhn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:23:39 -0500
I would have to second this and say that it is frightening to imagine what some
MDs are diagnosing and treating patients from!!
Lisa Kuhn, COMT, CRA, OCT-C
Assistant Manager Patient Services
Hauser-Ross Eye Institute
2240 Gateway Drive
Sycamore, IL 60178
(815)756-8571
________________________________
From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Ray Gardner
Sent: Mon 5/23/2011 8:20 AM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: Ophthalmic Technician training & certification
I have worked with 7 different retinal specialists over the years and all have
wanted their staff to be cross trained. They, including myself started as a
tech and then moved up to photography. I have always trained new staff as a
tech first so they get a basic understanding of the anatomy and physiology of
the eye. We usually have someone work as a tech for about 6 months to a year,
before training them as a photographer depending on their eagerness to learn. I
have coworkers that are working on their CRA and others who just don't care.
The quality of their work shows in the doctors frustration and the anger of the
patients. They ether don't get what is needed, don't know how to, and really
don't care. Anyone can be a monkey and push buttons. A CRA is an artist how
cares about their work at the highest level and cares about the people they
serve.
G. Ray Gardner, CRA, OCT-C, COA, OSA
Southwest Retina Specialists
7411 Wallace Blvd.
Amarillo, Texas 79106
office (806)351-1870
fax (806)351-1690
cell (806)676-9793
email: raygardner99@xxxxxxxxx
________________________________
From: Beth Koch <bethkoch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, May 23, 2011 5:31:59 AM
Subject: [optimal] Re: Ophthalmic Technician training & certification
VERY TRUE, I HEVE TECHS IN MY OFFICE THE SHOOT AND DO JUST THAT (THEY SHOOT) UT
AS FAR AS RECOGNIZING WHY AND WHAT THEY AE SHOOTING (FA,FUNDUS, ICG OR AF) OR
EVEN GETTING AN OCT IMAGE OF IS A WHOLE OTHER STORY. I DO POST SEG SONOGRAPHY
AND HAVE SEEN SOME HORRIFIC SCANS (ESPECIALLY OF NEVI ( OR WHAT THEY THINK ARE
NEVI). I AM A COT ROUB AND ALSO DO IMAGING AND IT SEEMS IN THESE TIMES OF
SPEED, QUALITY CAN BE SHOVED TO THE WAYSIDE AT TIMES BUT THERE ARE STILL SOME
DOCS OUT THERE WHO DO VALUE GOOD QUALITY IMAGES IN ALL MODALITIES SO THERE IS
HOPE.
Beth Koch COT, ROUB
Retina Consultants of WNY
bethkoch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
bkoch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bkoch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(716)908-4105
What we have done for ourselves, alone dies with us,
What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal....
~Albert Pike
________________________________
From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Lori Guerette
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 9:39 PM
To: < optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: [optimal] Re: Ophthalmic Technician training & certification
It seems that offices are asking photographers to do more than just taking
pictures. Being COA helps.
But offices are also 'training' some techs to cover photography tasks - 'just
get an image.' Learning to recognize pathology is not as appreciated. Some
just want a photo, some want detail. Not enough of the latter.
Frustrating.
May you find your marbles -
And the joy you remember with them ; )
Sent via Iphone
On May 22, 2011, at 8:19 PM, "Stuart Alfred, B.S., C.R.A., OCT-C"
<stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alexis,
I would tend to lean toward Jennifer's view. I don't want to get into
a long diatribe about it but with one vendor of SD-OCT posting videos stating
that the new instruments are easily operated by the front office staff, and
seeing that some of these instruments are simple to get an image with, it seems
that skilled and experienced ophthalmic imagers are not valued like they were
just a few years ago. Note: getting an image is a far cry from documenting the
accurate pathology. I've personally taken on more technician skills to secure
future employment opportunities. In fact, while reimbursements for some
special tests may have gone down fractionally, the increasing volume of
patients should warrant valued demand for skilled clinicians - but I'm not
seeing that in the offices I've visited over recent years. Salaries are being
squeezed to the point wiser folks are heading into other certification areas;
Registered Nurse etc.
Only my two cents, hope I'm wrong.
stuart
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Alexis Smith <
<mailto:alexis@xxxxxxxx> alexis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jennifer,
Those prior years can be used for your work requirement to sit for the
Certified Retinal Angiographer (CRA) exam. You would just need a letter from
you past employer on official letterhead stating that you worked as a retinal
angiographer for at least two years.
You would still need to complete the portfolio component in order to
qualify to sit for the exam. You could always call a few local clinics or
hospitals to see if they would let you intern or shadow so that you could
complete your portfolio.
Details for the CRA exam can be found here:
<http://opsweb.org/Certif/CRACertif.html>
http://opsweb.org/Certif/CRACertif.html
Please feel free to contact me directly with any other questions
regarding certification with the Ophthalmic Photographers' Society.
But, I'm curious why you would say that just being a photographer is no
longer a viable option without also being a technician? There are LOTS of out
out there that only perform ophthalmic photography as our job. Any one else on
Optimal with thoughts on this?
Sincerely,
Alexis Smith
OPS Board of Certification
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:06 PM, JH < <mailto:jennyhartigan@xxxxxxxxx>
jennyhartigan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
I have a few questions regarding acquiring ophthalmic technician
certification. I have worked in the Ophthalmology field as a photographer for
nearly 8 years. However I have been out of the field for almost 5 years now. I
did some investigating online to find out how I can get trained and certified.
However, I am finding several different options but most of them say that I
have to have worked in the field a year prior to apply for COA or COT. Is this
true? Does my prior experience count at all? I realize that just being a
photographer is no longer a viable option without also being a technician. I
really want to get back into the field. I appreciate any advice or direction
that you all could provide. Thank you
Sincerely,
Jennifer L. Hartigan
<mailto:jennyhartigan@xxxxxxxxx> jennyhartigan@xxxxxxxxx
West Palm Beach, Florida
--
Stuart Alfred, CRA, OCT-C
<http://stuartalfred.com/> http://stuartalfred.com
<http://stuartalfred.com/> 317 517-9455
528 N. Bauman St .
Indianapolis , IN 46214-3618
This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the
recipient(s)
named above. It may contain information that is protected, privileged,
or
confidential,* and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or
copied to
persons not authorized to receive such information*. If you are not the
intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is
strictly
prohibited. If you think you have received this e-mail message in
error,
please e-mail the sender immediately at
<mailto:stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx> stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx
--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged or confidential
information. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any copying, distribution, dissemination
or action taken in relation to the contents of this e-mail and any of its
attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently
delete the original e-mail and destroy any copies or printouts of this e-mail
as well as any attachments.
Other related posts:
