[optimal] Re: Heidelberg Optics Question
- From: Brice Critser <bricecritser@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:37:11 -0600
We're in the process of getting the wide field lens from Heidelberg. Does
anyone have the new lens for the Spectralis? If so, as a dovetail to the wide
angle discussion, have you noticed the reduction of the central artifact with
the 55 degree lens (as promised by Heidelberg)?
Brice Critser
Director of Imaging
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Sent from my iPhone 5
> On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:07 AM, "Cavicchi, Robert"
> <Robert.Cavicchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 3 thought – leaders from our organization.
> Surely one of you can write this up and submit an abstract at the OPS 2014
> Scientific Paper Session.
>
> bob
>
> From: <Steffens>, Timothy
> <tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Reply-To: Optimal <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Friday, November 22, 2013 9:59 AM
> To: Optimal <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [optimal] Re: Heidelberg Optics Question
>
> I agree with Eric. We do the same at Kellogg.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim Steffens, CRA
> Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
> University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
> 1000 Wall Street
> Ann Arbor, MI
> P: 734-936-2283
> tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> From: Eric Kegley
> <ekegley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ekegley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Reply-To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:33 PM
> To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [optimal] Re: Heidelberg Optics Question
>
> Tom,
>
> We typically use our Optos for diabetics now, but when we were using our
> Heidelberg with a 55 lens, I typically would do the same as you and leave the
> 55 lens on and use the 35 degree setting on high res and feel my images were
> very good.
>
> Thanks,
> EK
>
> [cid:492263222@21112013-28F8]Eric Kegley, CRA, COA
> Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
> Retina Consultants of Houston
> 6560 Fannin St., Suite 750
> Houston, TX 77030
>
> Main 713 524-3434
> Fax 713 524-3220
> www.houstonretina.com<http://www.houstonretina.com/>
> www.facebook.com/RetinaConsultantsofHouston<http://www.facebook.com/RetinaConsultantsofHouston>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Steele
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:19 PM
> To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [optimal] Heidelberg Optics Question
>
> I get requests for macula studies early & late with Diabetic Scans. The 55
> degree lens offers an optical 35 degree setting without removing the lens.
> Though the 35 degree setting is not a true optical lens; it’s still very
> sharp with comparing the 30 degree lens images vs an optical 35 degree
> setting with the 55 degree lens.
>
> For me, 35 degrees gives a much more manageable field of view. My question is
> then, how many of you forgo using 30 degree lens and instead use the 55
> degree lens and 35 degree setting for a combo mac/diabetic scans FA?
>
> Thank You,
>
> Tom Steele, CRA
> Midwest Eye Institute
> 200 West 103rd Street
> Indianapolis, Indiana 46290
> 317.817.1018
> tsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and/or
> privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return
> the original message to us at the above email address
>
>
> **********************************************************
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
> used for urgent or sensitive issues
> <Small VRC Logo.bmp>
Other related posts:
