If broadcasters really want to suggest schemes that would "meet the goals of the NBP," then I think Sinclair's approach is more realistic, or maybe I should say "honest." But I don't necessarily see how that would save FOTA TV. To improve upon the spectral efficiency of ATSC, you need either (a) SFNs *and* regional broadcasting, or (b) MIMO. If you use MIMO and LTE/WiMax, on this same TV infrastructure, broadcasters would be able to offer broadband too. Now you're talking NBP goals. But to exploit the efficiencies of MIMO techniques, you need to build a truly cellular system. You would build out a cellular topology that reaches way out in the fringes of large US markets, much like cell phone systems do. That's what you have to have for the MIMO advantages to exist far from the urban canyons. You need to create those Rayleigh propagation environments out in the distant suburbs. Range from each tower will be nothing like big stick range. But this costs as much money as it does for the traditional telcos. If broadcasters find it difficult to cover their costs now, with advertizing revenues alone, I fail to see how they will be able to do so with a significantly more expensive infrastructure. Honestly, my view of all of this is, not much that the FCC or the broadcasters are suggesting will create a better FOTA system than I *finally* got, after almost 20 years of waiting, starting in 2005. And way improved in 2009. The broadcasters might go the way of a wireless MVPD, perhaps concentrating on mobile devices and mobile programming, and the current FCC would prefer I scrapped my OTA antenna farm altogether. Forgive me for not holding my breath. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.