John Shutt wrote: > The Robust portion of E-VSB is claimed to have a S/N of 9 dB,=20 > so that is a > wash with DVB-T HM. The LP portion of E-VSB is 15 dB vs.=20 > DVB-T HM's 19.6 > dB. Okay, so the comparison was not apples to apples. By the way, I'll say again that there's *nothing* magic about the 14.9 dB C/N margin requirement for 8-VSB. It is merely the threshold of visibility of errors given the way the overall FEC is implemented. Meaning, independent trellis and RS decoding. This can change, as we get a better integrated FEC decoding techniques in place. > However, as walking around in my bosses office will=20 > easily demonstrate, > there is more to receivability than carrier to noise figures. This is no doubt a dynamic echo problem, then, and I don't think your boss is using a Linx Casper chip yet (not that dynamic echo is its forte, but then again, it ahould be fine for just people walking about). > At the 2000 > NAB, the LP portion of the DVB-T HM stream was received on=20 > the convention > floor, where no 8-VSB could be received at any booth by any vendor. Yeah, we know that early receivers sucked. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.