[opendtv] It's Just about MUSIC...for now

  • From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: OpenDTV Mail List <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:38:15 -0500

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/14/business/yourmoney/14music.html?oref=login&th


November 14, 2004

Gates vs. Jobs: The Rematch

By SAUL HANSELL


San Jose, Calif.

THE history of Apple Computer can be told through its advertisements 
as well as its products. There was, of course, the commercial that 
introduced the Macintosh. It was broadcast exactly once, during the 
1984 Super Bowl, and signaled the company's bid to reclaim leadership 
in personal computers from I.B.M. and its tiny, little-known software 
partner, Microsoft.

Late last month, Steven P. Jobs, Apple's chairman, rented an ornate 
theater here to promote Apple's latest advertisement for its iPod 
music player - a crisp psychedelic montage of the Irish pop band U2 
playing "Vertigo," a song from its next album. Unlike the 1984 
commercial, this one is intended to help Apple preserve a big, and 
growing, lead in the marketplace.

Speaking just after the event, Bono, U2's lead singer, said the band 
was not charging Apple a penny to be in the ad. (The band says it had 
turned down as much as $23 million to use its music in other 
commercials.) In its three-year life, the iPod has achieved such 
"iconic value," Bono said, that U2 gets as much value as Apple does 
from the commercial, by promoting its music and the new Red and Black 
U2 edition of the iPod, for which the band gets royalties.

The iPod, Mr. Jobs boasted at the event, has become the "Walkman of 
the 21st century." It dominates its market in a way that no Apple 
product has done in a generation, raising the possibility that the 
company is becoming more than just a purveyor of computers with high 
design and low market share. If Apple continues to ride the wave of 
digital consumer electronics products, it may become the Sony of the 
21st century.

For that to happen, however, Mr. Jobs must do what he failed to do 
last time: prevail over his old nemesis, Bill Gates, who sees 
entertainment as Microsoft's next great frontier. Microsoft is 
working hard to make sure that the iPod is less like the Walkman and 
more like the Betamax, Sony's videocassette format that was defeated 
in the marketplace by VHS.

A few days after Apple's U2 extravaganza, Mr. Gates, Microsoft's 
chairman, paced around his office overlooking the rolling hills of 
suburban Seattle and recalled another advertisement that Apple made 
25 years ago. "When I.B.M. came out with their PC, Apple ran an ad 
saying, "Welcome,' " said Mr. Gates. "They haven't yet run the ad 
welcoming us into the music business.

"Apple should," he added.

But he isn't holding his breath. Instead, Microsoft is turning up the 
volume in the portable music business. And Mr. Gates makes no secret 
that he expects to beat Mr. Jobs in that market as convincingly as he 
did in personal computers.

In many ways, the story sounds eerily familiar. As was the case in 
computers, Apple has sprinted ahead in the music market with an 
innovative product, elegant design and tight links between its 
hardware and software. Plodding along after it is a vast army, 
organized by Microsoft, of rivals that may be less skillful than 
Apple but offer a broader array of options and cheaper prices.

IN music, Microsoft has rallied nearly every other manufacturer - 
like Dell, Samsung and Rio - to support a new version of Windows 
Media. That audio standard allows their gadgets to play songs bought 
from most music service companies, including America Online, Napster 
and RealNetworks, as well as its own new MSN Music store. Microsoft's 
campaign slogan for the services and players is "plays for sure."

The iPod cannot play songs from most other stores, and Apple's iTunes 
store won't sell songs for other players. Mr. Gates argues that 
consumers ultimately will want more choices. "There's nothing unique 
about music in terms of, do people want variety of fashion, do people 
want low price, do they want many distribution channels?" he said. 
"This story has played out on the PC and worked very well for the 
choice approach there."

Mr. Jobs rejects the comparison between the music players and 
computers. The Macintosh had an uphill battle, Apple says, because so 
many corporate customers already had applications based on 
Microsoft's operating system that they didn't want to abandon. By 
contrast, Apple's iTunes Music Store sells pretty much the same songs 
that the others do, but they cannot be moved onto non-Apple portable 
devices.

Most important, he points out, Apple's market share has actually 
increased over the last year, despite increasing competition. "We 
offer customers choice," he said during a news conference after the 
U2 event, answering a question about Microsoft's strategy. "They 
don't like the choices our customers are making."

Indeed, in the third quarter, some two million iPods were sold - more 
than all of its competitors combined, and more than double the pace 
of the second quarter. Market analysts and even rivals expect that 
Apple will sell more of them this Christmas season and continue to 
dominate the market into next year.

What happens next Christmas and beyond, however, is a matter of 
considerable debate. Microsoft fans say that other music players will 
begin to match Apple's features and styling, and with lower prices. 
They suggest that consumers, meanwhile, will want to buy music from 
stores other than iTunes.

"Over time, proprietary standards always lose because industry 
standards always win because you get more for less," said Michael A. 
George, the general manager of Dell's consumer business. Dell has 
just introduced a 5-gigabyte music player, using the Windows 
standard, for $199, some $50 less than Apple's iPod Mini, which has 4 
gigabytes.

Microsoft is also betting that a new crop of subscription services, 
like Napster to Go, which let users fill up a music player with 
thousands of songs for a flat fee of $10 to $20 a month, will prove 
attractive to consumers. Mr. Jobs, by contrast, spent months 
convincing the record labels to allow Apple to sell songs one at a 
time for 99 cents each, and he argues that consumers prefer owning 
music to renting it.

"If you sit down next to me and say you have 1,000 songs and you pay 
$10 a month, how cool will I feel to say I paid $1,000 for 1,000 
songs," asked Jonathan Sasse, the president of iRiver America, a 
subsidiary of ReignCom, a Korean maker of portable players that has 
endorsed Microsoft's format for subscription services.

Still, dethroning the iPod won't be easy. One reason is that none of 
the rival electronics companies have made a player that is nearly as 
attractive and easy to use. "It is not an MP3 player; it is just an 
iPod, and it's only made by Apple," said Frank Sadowski, the head of 
Amazon.com's consumer electronics department. The proportion of 
Amazon.com customers who buy iPods continues to increase, he added.

Again, Apple is bucking the trend. The classic Silicon Valley 
playbook calls for the company to try to turn its hit product into a 
broader "platform." And many people argue that Apple should open up 
both the iPod and iTunes to rivals, so as to establish itself in the 
center of the digital music world.

BUT Geoff Moore, who articulated the platform strategy in his 1999 
book "Crossing the Chasm," argues that Apple is the rare company that 
should not follow his advice. Mr. Jobs, he said, has built the 
company around idiosyncratic, premium-priced products that gain 
appeal in part from their splendid isolation.

It's a risky strategy, Mr. Moore contends. "You are only as good as 
your latest hit," he said. "You know at some point you will miss a 
step."

But he says Apple is better off rolling the dice than trying to try 
to emulate Microsoft. "It is hard to change the DNA of a company, 
even if you have a great hand," he said. "There are some times that 
you say, 'there is a great opportunity here, but it is not for us.' "

There is no question that Apple has played the music business like a 
virtuoso, after ignoring the first several years of the online music 
boom. When Apple became interested in music players in 2001, it 
rejected the most common technology in the market, flash memory 
chips, which can make inexpensive players that can hold a few dozen 
songs. Rather, it latched onto an emerging design based on a hard 
drive that could hold thousands of songs.

A few hard-drive players already existed, but they were bulky. For 
the iPod's introduction, Apple bought the entire inventory of a new 
generation of smaller drives from Toshiba, making the iPod the 
sleekest hard-drive player in the market. This prevented rivals from 
offering the smaller players for months.

Since then, Apple has been quick to add new features. In the spring, 
it introduced the iPod Mini, based on 1-inch drives, and last month 
it introduced iPod Photo, with the ability to bore your friends with 
thousands of snapshots of your latest vacation on its small color 
screen. Each innovation was matched quickly by rivals, but Apple was 
able to cement its position in the minds of its consumers as the 
leader in online music.

It was helped even more by competitors' missteps. Sony, in theory, 
would have been the strongest rival, but it tripped over its own 
conflicting agendas. Sony's biggest bet in digital music was the 
MiniDisc, a popular format in Japan that never took off in the United 
States. And because it owned a major record label, Sony manufactured 
players that made it difficult to play MP3 files, the sort that were 
traded freely on file-sharing services.

The pioneers in the market were Rio (born as Diamond Multimedia) and 
Creative Technology, both makers of add-on sound cards for PC's. 
Neither had Apple's marketing savvy or budget. Samsung, for its part, 
chose to focus on the more lucrative cellphone and flat-panel 
television businesses, letting its MP3 business flounder.

Indeed, Apple has been able to keep its leading share even though its 
products are priced above similar models from rivals. Judging by its 
latest crop of products, Apple seems to believe that its profit 
margins can grow. The U2 iPod, for example, is priced at $349, or $50 
more than an identical model with a white case. Adding the photo 
features to an iPod costs less than $20, competitors say, but Apple 
has been able to charge $100 extra for iPod Photo, over the $399 
price of the comparable, music-only player.

"The iPod is an affordable luxury," said Michael Gartenberg, the 
research director of Jupiter Research. "It's not the cheapest player 
on the market, but you don't spend thousands of dollars extra to own 
one."

While Apple has not opened the iPod to other music stores, it did 
make an important decision to go after the broader market by building 
a version for Windows computers. And it reached an agreement with 
Hewlett-Packard for H-P to resell iPods and install iTunes software 
on its computers.

Microsoft has been developing the Windows Audio formats for nearly a 
decade as part of the media player built into Windows. It has long 
licensed these formats for use in portable players, and it recently 
added features for so-called digital rights management, which allow 
music labels to control who plays a song and under what 
circumstances. (Apple developed its own digital rights plan, called 
FairPlay, that also is intended to thwart digital piracy.)

As the underdog in audio technology, Microsoft has marshaled its 
formidable resources to get others behind its standard. For example, 
the fee that electronics companies pay to license the Windows Media 
format is about half of what the owners of MP3 charge. And Microsoft 
has offered all sorts of engineering help and marketing muscle to 
electronics companies and music service purveyors in return for their 
adopting the Windows formats.

"Microsoft made it worth our while to get them into our box," said 
Hugh Cooney, the president of Rio, a unit of D&M Holdings of Japan. 
Rio had been using software from RealNetworks. "They bring a whole 
suite of service to us, marketing, help with testing and engineering 
support," he said.

Not surprisingly, RealNetworks was not thrilled. Last year, it filed 
a $1 billion antitrust suit against Microsoft, accusing it of 
anticompetitive practices in the player software market. In the 
meantime, RealNetworks has largely abandoned that business to focus 
on selling subscription music and video services.

Microsoft also raised hackles recently when it started its MSN Music 
Store to compete with companies like Napster that it had been 
courting for years. That isn't so unusual for Microsoft, its 
executives say. The company often finds itself both competing and 
cooperating, they say, with companies in the software business.

For the most part, though, the music world, from the electronics 
companies to the music labels, has embraced Microsoft. "I never would 
have believed I would say this, but Microsoft has been easy to work 
with," said Ted Cohen, a senior vice president at EMI Recorded Music.

One reason that Microsoft can be so accommodating is that it does not 
need to make money on media software, as RealNetworks does. It does 
sell operating systems for telephones, personal digital assistants 
and television set-top boxes. But all of these are meant first and 
foremost to encourage people to buy more and more powerful PC's, each 
with Windows.

"The key to all this is that in the end, the consumer gets a great 
experience with digital entertainment that the PC makes better," said 
Will Poole, the senior vice president of Microsoft's Windows client 
division.

Many other PC makers, like H-P, Dell and Gateway, see their futures 
in consumer electronics and have started making devices like cameras, 
flat-screen televisions and music players. They also hope to sell 
more computers, based on Microsoft's Media Center software, to power 
home entertainment systems.

Apple's leading position with the iPod, marketing experts say, could 
give it a leg up in these other markets. That is why some analysts 
are puzzled that Apple's sleek new iMac, a computer built into a 
flat-panel display, does not record and play television shows the way 
a Media Center PC does.

Mr. Jobs declines to discuss his product plans. He has been openly 
contemptuous of attempts to add video playback to hard-drive music 
players, as Microsoft has with its new design called Portable Media 
Center. And other Apple executives pointed out that the Media Center 
PC had not been a success in the market until recently, and that 
Apple tried to sell computers with TV tuners in them a few years ago, 
with disappointing results.

Longtime Apple watchers say they recognize a pattern. In the past, 
they say, Mr. Jobs has often dismissed a market as irrelevant before 
introducing just such a product, with a great flourish. He then 
explains that he has solved the problems his lesser competitors 
couldn't. It worked stunningly well with music. And many expect that 
he will try again, with some products related to television.

MICROSOFT, however, cares far less about music than it does about 
television, a much bigger market. It has attacked it from many sides 
- not only with the Media Center PC and Portable Media Center, but 
with software for cable boxes, WebTV and the Xbox video game system. 
None of these have left Microsoft with a position in television that 
is even slightly similar to its chokehold on computers. (And it's not 
clear that Hollywood and the cable companies would like that to 
happen.) But the company has patience that is almost as deep as its 
pocketbooks.

So it is easy to imagine, a few years from now, that an elegant, hip 
Apple digital television product will be battling for the home 
entertainment market against a much larger army of rivals using 
various forms of Microsoft software. "It's a classic one," Mr. Gates 
said. "Apple has always been a hardware company. I think Apple will 
do things the Apple way, and Microsoft will do things the Microsoft 
way. I'd say the long-term factors all favor our approach."

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts:

  • » [opendtv] It's Just about MUSIC...for now