[openbeosnetteam] Re: test_mbuf???
- From: Ksyu & Dima <k2d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:09:59 -0400
David Reid wrote:
>>>>I played a bit with the test program, perhaps these findings help
>>>>you:
>>>>- it doesn't matter how many threads you are starting (it also
>>>>crashes
>>>>with only one thread)
>>>>- the threads crash when they return
>>>>- they don't crash anymore, when you have more than 224 loops: with
>>>>up
>>>>to 223 loops, they will always crash, with 224 and more loops, they
>>>>never crash - 100% reproducible.
>>>>
>>>That's no real help is it=3F thanks for your efforts, but so far I
>>>can't see
>>>anything that's wrong. It looks like the stack gets corrupted eaarly
>>>on
>>>
>>You should know :-)
>>At least it's clear that it doesn't have to do with the thread
>>handling. BTW I tried the (fixed and the bad one) mbuf test with no
>>extra threads up to 100 threads. Works indeed fine now.
>>Do anyone on this list has a dual-CPU machine to test the code=3F
>>
>
> Damn fine point! We need to make sure we're smp happy :)
>
> david
I'll test it... :D
dmitri
Other related posts:
