I started proficiency based assessment last year - this year I am doing a modified version of it with 10% for cuaderno checks & quizzes and 90% for on-demand assessments and conversation/speaking goals for each assessment, I give students a different, yet similar rubric - each assessment will receive 4-6 scores, based on how many standards are being assessed (with scores of 1-4) - (possible categories: message, text type, etc...) I am not tying their proficiency level to their grade, but instead using it as an indicator for growth over the year and to base the level of the class - ie. where are we and where are we headed? my students do performance-based assessments which are usually a one-on-one interview with me or an on-demand role-play with a random partner and for writing it is an on-demand assessment as well (answer questions, describe pictures, etc..., not a standardized fill-in-the-blank test) Students have the opportunity to re-assess up to two times during the semester if they are not proficient (ie, scores of 1 or 2) - they must come in and meet with me first - I find this time really helpful for me to work one-on-one with kids who are struggling in class and it allows them a chance to improve and show progress. Often times I will plan it so all the kids wanting/needing to re-assess come in for a tutor session at the same time Their score for OWL conversation goals and speaking standards will be periodically updated in the gradebook, with the idea that by the end of the semester, they are all at 3s and 4s (meets and exceeds) - they will also self-assess on these periodically I have lots of different rubrics I use, depending on the assessment, that I would be happy to share - For example: my first assessment in Spanish 2 is a series of basic questions about self and daily life 1 (ie. biographical info, family, school, date/time/day, weather, interests, etc...) - I usually ask about 5-8 questions with follow-up What is still a big challenge for me is making the grading rubrics fair and level-appropriate at the same time. What is "exceeds standard" if most students should be at Novice Mid coming in to Spanish 2? Should it be Novice High performance? Is "meets" Novice Mid? This is why I don't tie proficiency levels to the grade, since really the idea is that everyone, regardless of where they're at, improves and moves up a level by the end of the year. Again, it's all new for me and something I am still figuring out JoAnna Coleman Spanish Teacher Wilson High School 503-916-5280 ext. 75231 joannac@xxxxxxx http://profecoleman.wordpress.com/ ________________________________ From: ola-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ola-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Jody Soberon [JodySo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:55 AM To: tess.siemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ola@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ricardo Subject: [ola] NEW Grading, rubrics and other issues Hello, We are still trying to figure out the MEPNI Mastery, Exceeds, Proficient, etc Proficiency grading. I have emailed as many of you as I know that work in Oregon. Is everybody using the new MEP grading system? As a Singleton, or solo teacher, you are my PLC team to run ideas by. I thought I had the grading figured out, but besides my Principal wanting me to do a pre-assessment so as to measure growth, he wants me to have a rubric so as to effectively and objectively measure or evaluate my students levels and growth. Can I use Ricardo's Task Performance Data Sheet and Individual Performance sheets as a Rubric? What are you using? Also, besides grading being done using M,E,P... all rubrics and grading need to be Standards Based of course, so I was actually designing the grade based on Proficiency at 75% to include all speaking, reading and writing activities/projects/etc. based on Interpersonal, Interpretive and Presentational Mode Standards, and then 5 C's at 25% - 5% of which is the Community grade for practice outside the classroom. Any thought, docs, etc. would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!!! :) Jody Foreign Languages Brookings Harbor High School