Stefan mentions county listing in Minnesota. I keep track of birding there. They have 82 counties, mostly small. Yet they have 3 people who have reached the 200-in-every-county benchmark. Consider working toward that level in every slice of Oregon that has 20 townships - it's like doing it 20 times in each National Forest of Oregon. Good birding, even if you don't keep any list, Paul Sullivan -------------------------- Subject: Re: Goal met -- 200 species in every Oregon county Date: Tue Sep 30 2014 22:39 pm From: greenfant AT hotmail.com Paul, congratulations on this great achievement! Nobody is even close in OR. Has anyone else even reached 150 yet? Btw, the OR listing results are here: http://www.orbirds.org/listing... Just for reference, Tom Mansfield is about to crack the 200 barrier in WA any day now (last I heard he was 1 short in Wahkiacum). A few folks in WA have reached 175. The WA listing results can be found here: http://www.wabirder.com/online... If you think you are nuts, Paul, look at CA. The county birder page with those neat maps is here: http://www.sterlingbirds.com/c... John Luther was at 232 by beginning of the year ... County birding seems to be particular popular on the West Coast, largely since there is a "manageable" number of counties. Look at TX for example, where there are 254 counties. County birding from hell, I would say. Even for Paul ... :-) Other states like AZ only have 15 counties. There it is probably less interesting to take the 100-a-county challenge. A few other states like MN (http://moumn.org/cgi-bin/countylist.pl?op=cunty) and FL (http://www.flcountylisting.com...) also do it. There are likely many more that I'm not aware. Maybe this is an appeal for Paul to do a write-up for Oregon Birds. :-] Stefan SchlickHillsboro, OR