[obol] Re: Fwd: TAKE ACTION: Protect this rare West Coast species from imminent extinction

  • From: Alan Contreras <acontrer56@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: deweysage@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:00:26 -0800

I agree with Dave.  I think it would be ok to have a one-time post referring 
interested people to a web site or a different chat-list.  Actual discussion of 
non-bird stuff is not what OBOL is for.
.
.
Alan Contreras
acontrer56@xxxxxxxxx

Eugene, Oregon




On Dec 9, 2014, at 8:52 AM, DJ Lauten and KACastelein wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> While it is commendable that Michael and others care about fishers, I ask 
> everyone to proceed with a lot of caution.
> 
> The issue here is that if we are ok with a post like this about fishers, are 
> we ok with post about this species and that species and that species too and 
> also those fish and that comment period, and oh, what about this issue and 
> how about that one.   And in the meantime let's have a debate about the 
> merits of this issue, and that issue too, and how about whether or not this 
> is an issue, or maybe that issue.....
> 
> If the moderators allow us to discuss the merits of this issue, I have to let 
> everyone express their personal issue or what they think is important too.   
> I think most of us want OBOL to be about birds, and bird sitings, and bird 
> related issues, but I think we all don't want our OBOL inbox to be full of 
> debatable issues, and non bird related ones.
> 
> I want to make it clear that I am not taking a particular stance on this 
> issue.   In fact, I happen to know a little about fishers since I have 
> actually done some research on them, so one could argue that they have a 
> place in my mind (and maybe even heart).
> 
> And I am not necessarily scolding anyone for this post.
> 
> However, I think we need to be careful about posting these kind of things.   
> I think sometimes it might be better to post "if you care to comment on the 
> current fisher plan, you can do that here (link)" without posting how one 
> feels about the issue or even what the issues are.   But at the same time, I 
> don't think that any of us wants to see the OBOL digest full of "here is 
> another comment period on (fill in the blank for species/issues)".   I think 
> really quickly we'd all be bogged down in issues and not bird sitings.
> 
> Fair enough?
> 
> Cheers
> Dave Lauten
> moderator
> 
> 
> 
> 
> OBOL archives: www.freelists.org/archive/obol
> Manage your account or unsubscribe: //www.freelists.org/list/obol
> Contact moderators: obol-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 

Other related posts: