Ok, now I understand - thanks for clarification.
Greetings, Greg.
W dniu 02.02.2017 19:58, Joseph Lee napisał/a:
Hi,
I said that last time because translators could delete old changes entries without realizing that this is a committer eror, and they should have something to fall back to. For now, all is well.
Cheers,
Joseph
*From:*nvda-translations-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nvda-translations-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Grzegorz Zlotowicz
*Sent:* Thursday, February 2, 2017 10:53 AM
*To:* nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: [nvda-translations] Follow-up to old what's new entries: old entries restored, go ahead and remove translated revisions from changes new revisions folders
Yes, I saw this erroneous diff, but it seems for me that short information to ignore this particular error in given changeset number, would be enough to avoid problems, still don't understand why we were told not to delete processed changesets in "changes new revisions" subfolder.
I'm asking, because good understanding of system is best way to avoid errors.
Greetings, Greg.
W dniu 02.02.2017 18:21, Joseph Lee napisał/a:
Hi,
For each Git revision, there is “differences.txt” that lists
changes to files in unified diff format. For us translators, a
plus sign (+) at the start of the line indicates new strings,
while a minus sign (-) indicates we should remove obsolete
strings. A few days ago, there was a commit to nVDA source code to
truncated what’s new entries older than 2010.2, thus causing
differences text file to mark entries as no longer needed to be
translated. A few days later, the old entries have returned, thus
it isn’t necessary for translators to do the hard work of removing
and adding back revisions they have translated.
Cheers,
Joseph
*From:*nvda-translations-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nvda-translations-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:nvda-translations-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of
*Grzegorz Zlotowicz
*Sent:* Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:16 AM
*To:* nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* Re: [nvda-translations] Follow-up to old what's new
entries: old entries restored, go ahead and remove translated
revisions from changes new revisions folders
I didn't understand original announcement.
In what way, content of changes-new revisions subfolder, could
affect the translated changes.t2t file, located one folder up.
As I understood, Joseph's announcement, the translated changes.t2t
was truncated after 2010.1 version.
In the subject of those message, it was written:
please don't delete old what's new revisions
And then, in the mail body:
with a certain commit, old what’s new entries (changes.t2t)
for 2010.1 and earlier were accidentally removed. [...] So
please don’t delete your valuable translations.
I checked, that translated pl/changes are present up to 2009.1
version, so I deleted unneeded changes new revisions and hope i
didn't spoil anything...
But, just for my curiosity - I'd like to understand implied
connection between untranslated changes new revisions folder, and
translated changes.t2t one folder up (mechanism of using first
untranslated rev. in subfolder to make structural comparisons
against currently translated file is obvious).
Greetings, Greg.
W dniu 02.02.2017 03:37, James Teh napisał/a:
Ug. I've fixed this in 38cec287 and also synced to svn. Thanks
for bringing my attention to it.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Joseph Lee
<joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
Hi all,
It looks like latest master’s copy of English what’s new
ends with a bug fix list for 2012.1. Thsnkc.
Cheers,
Joseph
*From:* Joseph Lee [mailto:joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx>]
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:37 PM
*To:* 'nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>'
<nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nvda-translations@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
*Subject:* Follow-up to old what's new entries: old
entries restored, go ahead and remove translated revisions
from changes new revisions folders
Hi all,
Old what’s new entries prior to 2010.2 have been restored,
so go ahead and remove translated revisions from your
“changes new revisions” folder. Thanks.
Cheers,
Joseph
