[nswnra] Re: Observing Report for AM 15/08/2010
- From: "Corona Australis" <corona_australis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <nswnra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:28:45 +1000
Glen,
Thanks for the feed back
Maybe since Dunlop used a 9" which would be similar to todays 8"
my 16" has four times the light gathering power of an 8"
So I'm thinking I probably got Lac III.14 if you take the faint star possibly
not seen by Dunlop out of my diagram it is a obtuse angle triangle.
I'll have to revisit 6777 and have another look, or you can show me next
meet up.
Cheers,CS
Rob
From: nswnra-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nswnra-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of G C
Sent: Monday, 16 August 2010 06:21
To: nswnra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [nswnra] Re: Observing Report for AM 15/08/2010
The diagram of D319 is correct.
I am not sure about the others.
6777 is 3 stars in a row. (faint bright bright)
III.14 is 3 stars in an obtuse angle triangle.
Glen
Other related posts:
