SECUR> Response to comments on NIST SP800-38B
- From: Gleason Sackmann <gleason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: NetHappenings <nethappenings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:33:06 -0500
**************************************************************
Net Happenings - From Educational CyberPlayGround
**************************************************************
To: dworkin@xxxxxxxx
Subject: response to comments on NIST SP800-38B
NIST received several thoughtful public comments on the draft NIST Special
Publication 800-38B specifying RMAC as a recommended MAC algorithm for use
with either AES and Triple DES. In response to the comments, NIST has
posted a consultation paper at http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/modes/,
with a link to the paper under the heading "NIST Recommendation for
Modes." The paper summarizes the technical issues underlying the selection
of a block cipher based MAC and proposes to refocus the RMAC specification
to its underlying EMAC construction.
Further comments on the draft SP 800-38B and the consultation paper may be
submitted to EncryptionModes@xxxxxxxx until May 5, 2003.
**************************************************************************
Educational CyberPlayGround links to Technology
<http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/Technology/Home_TECHNOLOGY.html>
Find Information on Security for
Teachers, Administrators, Ed. Tech, and Classroom Resources
**************************************************************************
Regards,
Morris Dworkin
Computer Security Division
NIST
<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>
EDUCATIONAL CYBERPLAYGROUND
http://www.edu-cyberpg.com
<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>
Net Happenings,K12 Newsletters, Network Newsletters, New-list
http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/Community/index.html
HOT LIST OF SCHOOLS ONLINE
http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/Schools/default.asp
EDUCATION VENDOR DIRECTORY
http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/TheMall/Home_TheMall.asp
SERVICES
http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/PS/Home_Products.html
<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>
Other related posts:
- » SECUR> Response to comments on NIST SP800-38B
