[ncsc-moths] Re: Which Underwing?
- From: Hugh McGuinness <hdmcguinness@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:53:24 -0400
I agree that this photo shows C micronympha.
Hugh
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:30 PM, kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Size was near the upper range for this species so that could be it.
> There's are a couple of photos on BG that fit it pretty well.
> Thanks!
>
> Ken Childs
> Henderson, TN
> Chester County
>
> http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* "piephofft@xxxxxxx" <piephofft@xxxxxxx>
> *To:* ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 2, 2011 1:08 PM
> *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Re: Which Underwing?
>
> If this is a small underwing then try taking a look at the extremely
> variable # 8876 C. micronympha, The Little Nymph. I have a photo similar to
> yours of that species.
>
> Taylor Piephoff
> Charlotte, NC
> PiephoffT@xxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: TN Moths <tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ncsc-moths <
> ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sat, Jul 2, 2011 11:13 am
> Subject: [ncsc-moths] Which Underwing?
>
> My best guess is 8771 Catocala piatrix but since it's so worn, I'm not
> confident with that ID.
>
>
> http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p193/kjchilds/Moths%202011/Moths%202011%20temporary/IMG_5786.jpg
>
> http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p193/kjchilds/Moths%202011/Moths%202011%20temporary/IMG_5801.jpg
>
> Ken Childs
> Henderson, TN
> Chester County
>
> http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
