[ncsc-moths] Re: Too worn to ID?
- From: Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Ken,
I do agree that my moth resembles yours. Hopefully someone else has knowledge
about what we both have.
I will try to experiment around with my lens to get the best results.
Kyle
________________________________
From: kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, July 6, 2011 8:42:54 PM
Subject: [ncsc-moths] Re: Too worn to ID?
Kyle, I don't think this is a Ragweed Borer. It looks like a worn version of
the
Tort I've been trying to ID for awhile but without any success. See the
attached
photo.
You new lens has great potential but I think you may want to try shooting at
f/16 or maybe even smaller so you get more DOF.
Ken Childs
Henderson, TN
Chester County
http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011
________________________________
From: Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>
To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2011 7:29 PM
Subject: [ncsc-moths] Re: Too worn to ID?
Thanks Ali. I do believe you are correct.
Kyle
________________________________
From: Ali Iyoob <Aliiyoob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, July 6, 2011 8:26:58 PM
Subject: [ncsc-moths] Re: Too worn to ID?
Looks like a Ragweed Borer to me
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey everyone,
>
>I photographed this tort at Prairie Ridge. Is it too worn to id? If not, does
>anyone have any ideas? BTW, this is photographed with my new lens.
>
>Thanks,
>Kyle
<DSC_0112.7.jpg>
Other related posts:
