[ncsc-moths] Re: 9056 or 9057?
- From: kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, Jean.
My moth is pretty worn but I think some sign of that patch would still be
visible if it were a 9057.
Ken Childs
Henderson, TN
Chester County
http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011
________________________________
From: Jean Obrist <innisfreehorses@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2011 12:43 PM
Subject: [ncsc-moths] Re: 9056 or 9057?
Ken, all the 9057 moths on MPG and Bug Guide have a distinct
white patch in the thorax area. I would guess yours is 9056. Here is
my 9057. Even from a lateral view, you can see the white at the back of
the tuft.
Jean
----- Original Message -----
>From: kjchilds
>To: TN Moths ; ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:13 PM
>Subject: [ncsc-moths] 9056 or 9057?
>
>
>This one may be too worn to tell but it looks like either 9056 Homophoberia
>cristata, Waterlily Owlet or 9057 Homophoberia apicosa, Black Wedge-spot. I
>have the larval food plants for each species in this area so that doesn't
>help.
>
>
>
>http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p193/kjchilds/Moths%202011/Moths%202011%20temporary/IMG_5822.jpg
>
>Ken Childs
>Henderson, TN
>Chester County
>
>http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011
>
>
Other related posts:
