On 04/03/13 19:07, Nir Soffer wrote:
But I think that nn_list_item_erase needs some protection from junk data. Either ignore removal of nil item, or assert that item is not nil. Also item->next is not initialized - maybe no code is failing now because of this, but finally some code will. I don't think saving initialization time worth the possible trouble.
Fair enough. Couple of nanoseconds is not worth it. I've fixed the trunk to address both points above.
Thanks! Martin
