I’m trying to use both (#ifdef) but nanomsg has some behavior that I did not
fully understand and have no time to debug it now.
So keep using ZMQ.
But I’m also want to use nanomsg due performance factors
Carlos
On Sep 30, 2016, at 21:08, jfear@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi all,
I am a developer looking at options for communication middleware. ZeroMQ and
nanomsg are both compelling options. Ideally, nanomsg offers design
improvements and would be the choice.
But the project is obviously a lot less mature than zeroMQ, which has been
around for years longer. I'd like to get the opinion of the contributors: Is
the first production release of nanomsg 1.0.0 reliable enough to be used in
an enterprise setting? Does anyone know of a large piece of software that is
currently using nanomsg for middleware communication?
Thanks,
Jake Fear
